As Malaysians, we are very familiar with this hearsay:
Person X: “The temple is no longer how it used to be lah. Cannot feel Ammaṉ as before.”
Person Y: “Of course lah! The cāmi (deity) there already ikat (tied). The new management lah…”
Tying a God
So, is there actually a concept of “tying” a God? Why do some temples not feel as “powerful” as they used to? Why does the presence of the deity sometimes not appear as intense as it was before?
Saṅkocana
In Tantra, there is a ritual concept called saṅkocana, which literaly translates to 'shrinking' or 'drawing inward'. Basically making something 'smaller'.
The Tantrasamuccaya is a text which discusses this concept in detail. It is a 15th-century Kerala temple-ritual compendium accompanied by two important Sanskrit commentaries, the Vimarśinī and Vivaraṇa.
Tantrasamuccaya 11.3:
सङ्कोचनं स्वविभवस्वनिगूहनं स्यात्॥
saṅkocanaṃ svavibhavasvanigūhanaṃ syāt ||
Meaning: Saṅkocana is the concealment of one’s own manifestation within oneself.
Tantrasamuccaya 11.98:
देवेश प्रतिमामूर्ते मन्त्रमूर्ते परावरे।
अत्र सङ्कुचितो भूत्वा वासं कुरु तवाज्ञया॥
deveśa pratimāmūrte mantramūrte parāvare |
atra saṅkucito bhūtvā vāsaṃ kuru tavājñayā ||
Meaning: “O Lord of gods, whose form is the image and whose form is mantra, O Supreme and immanent Lord: having become shrunken here, remain here.”
Notice that the verse does not say “Leave the image.” It says: atra … vāsaṃ kuru (Remain/dwell here ). But it also says, 'saṅkucito bhūtvā' ( Having become contracted )
So yes, such a concept exists.
The deity is not removed from the image ( vigraha or idol )— but the manifested presence is ritually made smaller.
Think of a light. The light is still there, but it is dimmed and concentrated within a smaller space instead of illuminating the entire surroundings.
This is performed through a saṃhāra, or withdrawal, process. The deity’s outwardly expanded manifestation is progressively gathered inward — from the wider temple environment towards the sanctum, the image, and ultimately the inner locus of consciousness.
The extent of withdrawal depends on the person who does the ritual.
The divine and parivāra manifestation is progressively drawn inward:
outer boundary → middle circuit → inner circuit → inner maṇḍala → main temple → garbhagṛha → pīṭha → image→ heart-lotus ( seat of consciousness )
Why Is This Done?
The original purpose of this ritual is a noble and legitimate one.
Tantrasamuccaya 11.97
निष्क्रामणैकविहितं विधिमत्र मुक्त्वा
शेषं विशेषविदिह प्रविधाय कर्म।
सम्प्रार्थ्य तत्त्वकलशेन तथाभिषिच्य
सङ्कोचमाचरतु वा गृहमात्रजीर्णौ॥
niṣkrāmaṇaikavihitaṃ vidhim atra muktvā
śeṣaṃ viśeṣavid iha pravidhāya karma |
samprārthya tattvakalaśena tathābhiṣicya
saṅkocam ācaratu vā gṛhamātrajīrṇau ||
Meaning: When only the temple structure requires repair, the knowledgeable ācārya sets aside the niṣkrāmaṇa procedure, performs the other appropriate rites, petitions the deity, performs the tattva-kalaśa abhiṣeka, and then performs saṅkoca.
Commentary:
In substance: if the repair will take more than a month, niṣkrāmaṇa should be performed; if it will take less than that, saṅkoca is sufficient.
What Is Niṣkrāmaṇa?
Niṣkrāmaṇa is stronger than saṅkocana.
In saṅkocana, the deity remains associated with the principal image, but the outward manifestation is reduced.
In niṣkrāmaṇa, the localized divine presence is ritually asked to depart from the principal image or shrine and is usually transferred to another ritual support.
A typical situation is a bālālaya performed in connection with major temple renovation and kumbhābhiṣeka. The divine presence may be transferred into a temporary shrine, while major work is performed.
Thus:
1. Minor external repair → saṅkocana
2. Major or prolonged work involving the inner shrine or image→ niṣkrāmaṇa and temporary bālālaya
The deity does not “cease to exist” in either procedure. These rituals concern the localized ritual sānnidhya, not the omnipresent deity.
Reversing the Saṅkoca
Saṅkocana is not permanent.
The Tantrasamuccaya explicitly describes how it is reversed once the repair work has been completed.
Tantrasamuccaya 11.102
प्रासादं परिगृह्य तद्विधिसमाप्तौ शोधयित्वाथ तद्-
बिम्बं स्वोदितसप्तशुद्धिहवनस्नानादिना शोधयेत्।
धारायामिह तत्सरोरुहविकासाद्यं विधेयं धिया
प्राक्सङ्ख्योचिततत्त्वसृष्टिहवनादौ कर्मणा चाचरेत्॥
prāsādaṃ parigṛhya tadvidhisamāptau śodhayitvātha tad-
bimbaṃ svoditasaptaśuddhihavanasnānādinā śodhayet |
dhārāyām iha tatsaroruhavikāsādyaṃ vidheyaṃ dhiyā |
prāksaṅkhyocitatattvasṛṣṭihavanādau karmaṇā cācaret ||
Meaning: “When the prescribed renovation of the temple has been completed, the temple and the image should be purified through the prescribed sevenfold purification, homa, ritual bathing and other rites. Then, through visualization, the previously shrunken lotuses should be made to blossom open again. Thereafter, the previously prescribed rites beginning with the re-creation and expansion of the tattva-s and the corresponding homa-s should be performed.”
Knowledge Being Misused
The Tantrasamuccaya prescribes saṅkocana for legitimate temple renovation. Some individuals chose to perform this for adharmic ( non-righteous ) purpose. When a corrupt temple management runs the show, individuals would want to perform adharmic things. A deity's presence would be an obstacle to this. For instance, the deity will not even let them be in power!
To prevent this, they perform saṅkocana as they like to dim the deity's presence so that they can freely exploit power, siphon temple funds, see partiality and favorism to the archaka-s etc
The dimmed presence of the deity is what you emote as the temple not being like what it was. You are right in this context.
This is widely done in many Malaysian temples.
The Bhūta of Kerala
I will share a true story. There
But Isn’t God Omnipresent and All-Powerful?
Absolutely.
Most of us are ordinary human beings functioning within māyā. We are not continuously established in an enlightened state in which we experience God everywhere and in everything.
Temples therefore facilitate our connection with the deity by creating a specific sacred environment in which the divine presence is ritually localized and made accessible to the devotee.
A Deity is Invoked as A Guest
When a ritual is performed to invoke a deity, the deity is treated in many respects like an honoured guest.
That is why arcaka-s use specific mudrā-s and mantra-s during āvāhana, sthāpana, sannidhāna and related procedures.
In Śaiva Āgamic worship, a prayer of this type is offered after invocation:
स्वामिन् सर्वजगन्नाथ यावत्पूजावसानकम्।
तावत्त्वं प्रीतिभावेन लिङ्गेऽस्मिन् सन्निधिर्भव॥
svāmin sarvajagannātha yāvat pūjāvasānakam |
tāvat tvaṃ prītibhāvena liṅge ’smin sannidhir bhava ||
Meaning: “O Lord, Master of all the worlds, until the completion of this worship, please remain present in this liṅga with delight and grace.”
Remember - We invite the deity, not the other way round
Imagine inviting a highly honoured guest into your home. You are the host. The guest has come upon your invitation. A guest won't simply explore your entire house, walking upto the kitchen and bedroom, unless you formally invite. This is the ethic of a guest, right?
Similarly, when we invoke the deity as a guest, the deity accords to how we put the rules. The deity consents to that. A guest will leave the house if the host instructs to, because that is dharma.
The guest may respect the boundaries established by the host — not because the guest is powerless or controlled, but because the guest has voluntarily accepted the conditions of hospitality.
A guest will also not continue to stay in a place where there is no honour or respect.
Similarly, a deity will leave an image if the necessary rituals are not done.
Uttara Kāmikāgama, Prāyaścittavidhi, 30.204–205a:
एकमासावधिं यावत्ततः सम्प्रोक्षणं नयेत् ।
नान्यथा देवदेवस्य सन्निधिर्द्विजसत्तमाः ॥
eka-māsāvadhiṃ yāvat tataḥ saṃprokṣaṇaṃ nayet |
nānyathā devadevasya sannidhir dvijasattamāḥ ||
Meaning:
If the compulsory ritual is neglected, up to the period of one month [the prescribed prāyaścitta is to be performed]; thereafter saṃprokṣaṇa must be performed. Otherwise, the sannidhi of the Lord of gods is not present, O best of the twice-born.
Similarly, ritual language that requests a deity to remain, contract, expand or depart should not be interpreted as human beings possessing absolute control over God.
The ritual operates because the deity consents to participate in the ritual relationship.
In fact, during the ritual, the deity should consent with the verse:
वत्स सुस्वागतम्
vatsa susvāgatam
Meaning: My dear one, you are most welcome
Some sacred sites are believed to exist because the deity Himself or Herself chose to manifest there, rather than because humans first performed a formal installation.
Such sites cannot be affected by rituals.
Such a deity is usually associated inseparably with a natural feature such as a tree, rock, spring, anthill or other landscape feature.
In folk tradition, particularly with ugra-devatā-s, there are numerous accounts of attempts to remove such shrines being followed by extraordinary occurrences, accidents or other events interpreted by devotees as signs of divine resistance.
In Malaysia, it is not uncommon to hear mishaps and accidents, even death befalling those who attempt to demolish certain temples. You would have heard about trees that bleed as a bad omen when an attempt to cut it is made.
Another good example would be the famous Jalan Baru temple in Perai associated housing Maḍurai Vīraṉ and Muṉīśvara. A kumbhabhiṣeka was done few months ago. Even through periods of renovation and bālālaya, the deities' presence was never diminished even after niṣkrāmaṇa ( temporarily departing the deity from the image ).
Video: Jalan Baru temple during bālālayaThe sacred tree of the temple also has some miracles associated with it.
In Malaysia, it is indeed common to notice some deities demanding their site of residence or territory. As such, no force can change or go against their decision.
READ MORE:
1. Temples With Spirit instead of Deity
No comments:
Post a Comment